Subject:      Re: What, more AR talk?
From:         paradise@netcom.com
Date:         1995/06/30
Message-Id:   
Sender:       paradise@netcom7.netcom.com
References:   <3spjeb$oif@antares.en.com> <3sr7r3$det@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk> 
Organization: NETCOM On-Line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
Newsgroups:   comp.sys.atari.8bit


In article ,
Paul Rhodes  wrote:
>In article <3sr7r3$det@susscsc1.rdg.ac.uk> smrgoodw@reading.ac.uk (J. F. Goodwin) writes:
>
>
>   It would be good if he could spill the beans on anything that might not
>   have discovered. Or, even better, on what his plans were on the other
>   parts of AR...
>
>
>Okay. I'm not Philip Price, but I still have a message someone sent me
>years ago about AR. Here we go.....
>
>--
>Paul
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Category 13,  Topic 7
>Message 250       Tue Jan 02, 1990
>PHILIP.PRICE                 at 01:48 EST
> 
> Okay since I am a notorious procrastinator. I will give a brief outline of
>what was the main parts of AR as originally conceived.
[rest of post cut, see post for AR details]

... Glad you found this note I know I have a few times describe the AR 
series in concept and you message saves me a mouthful :)



-- 
                                             Philip Price
                                             paradise@netcom.com